Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

People who need to get over themselves

  • Apr. 13th, 2002 at 1:00 PM
eggplant mike (kyuuketsukirui)
My reply to Sphinx's review of Strega of Borg (Her comments are in italics.):

...to the pack of I'm Not Feminists (Or Not Your Kind of Feminists - whatever) who have appointed themselves the Guardians of True Feminine morality, Selflessness and Worth

I must have missed the memo that said that if I didn't like PtQ I had to turn in my feminist card. For the record, I've been calling myself a feminist proudly since I first read The Feminine Mystique at age 10. If I refused to let the MacDworkinites kick me out of the feminist tent for doing SM, I'm sure as hell not going to let you do so because I happen to believe that power exercised without restraint by any gender is dangerous.

And in case you were wondering, one of the primary reasons that those of us who don't think PtQ is the greatest fanfic ever are so vehement in our dislike is because we are tired of being told that we're not bright enough to get it, shallow, or anti-feminists who are insensitive to abuse survivors.

PtQ is a relatively well-written fic with some serious problems around narrative structure and characterization. I should be able to say that without being treated like I've committed heresy.

given, naturellement, a camouflaging lick of trendiness by the oh-so-cocky treatment of sexual themes

As opposed to the lick of pretension given by using buzzwords like "intertextualization" and slipping in a little cutsey French ("naturellement") while you're at it.

Comments

[info]lachupacabra wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2002 10:17 am (UTC)
good fucking lord!!
i think im going to have to
join my cat in a PUKEFEST!

"naturellement"??!!??

WHAT THE FUCK?
who REALLY uses that word anyway??!!??
(except the french maybe)

ack.
that totally ruined my caramel mocha breve.
;(
elisavet
~who unsubbed from WIKTT several weeks ago~
[info]skalja wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2002 10:19 am (UTC)
I've noticed that the less willing to admit fault in a favorite fic the fans of said fic are, the more likely they are to cover an inability to rebutt critcism by attacking the critic, directly or indirectly.
[info]meril wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2002 11:24 am (UTC)
I just had to read that review. I laughed. I'm wary of anyone who says they are "literate" and then claims that their knowledge of popular literature stops with HP. It's yet another case of snobbish sorts claiming that speculative fiction is not quality literature. Then again, I've noticed a lot of HP fans won't read anything but...and these are supposed adults here.
[info]mcamy wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2002 11:27 am (UTC)
Pop Culture Rules
I prefer popular culture, actually. It makes for an incredibly interesting study, and the good parts of it are more enjoyable than lots of the things I'm supposed to prefer, as a graduate student in literature. Besides, Shakespeare and Dickens were both popular culture in their day. I say that's pretty good company.

McAmy, who believes Dickens-the-serial-fiction writer would adore JKR.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2002 11:49 am (UTC)
The next time someone pulls that "I'm too good to read popular fiction" routine, recommend that they try Susan Shwartz. Her credentials ought to at least earn her one read from them: MA and PhD in Literature from Harvard. And she is, quite simply, my vision of a real feminist. Of course, she was in the movement from the beginning, alongside her efforts in the VietNam War protests.

Her short story in Alternate Presidents, about an alternate ending to the US involvement in VietNam, is heartrending. She's probably best known for her Star Trek books with Josepha Sherman, Vulcan's Forge and Vulcan's Heart, where they committed the unforgivable sin of marrying off Spock. ;) My personal favorite is still Grail of Hearts, her take on Parsifal.

A shame she dropped out of fandom years ago (she started out in Darkover fandom); I'd love to see her skewer that reviewer.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2002 01:56 pm (UTC)
*sighs*

You would think that I'd remember to sign posts.

J.
[info]eve_jukes wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2002 05:26 pm (UTC)
I think Sphinx should read Majorie Garber, who would, for lack of a better term than skewer ;) , "thoroughly kick her @$$" off her pedestal. She's one of Harvard's 14 elite university professors (and one of two women with tenure), and despite being as close to a demigoddess in literature as you can get, she revels in popular culture. Her Shakespeare lectures were so awesome that I kept my tape recordings of them.

To my complete surprise, I'm researching feminism and Arthurian literature at the Library of Congress two years later, and who do I find explaining the medieval faux pas of bisexuality that Marion Zimmer Bradley moralized in "Mists of Avalon?" You guessed it. That woman blows me away.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2002 06:13 pm (UTC)
for lack of a better term than skewer ;)

*grins*

That's me in SAP mode, I suppose; debating and duelling have so much in common to us.

J.
[info]auror_borealis wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2002 01:41 pm (UTC)
"As opposed to the lick of pretension given by using buzzwords like "intertextualization" and slipping in a little cutsey French ("naturellement") while you're at it."

She shoots, she scores! Well done :)
(Anonymous) wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2002 02:13 pm (UTC)
feminism started with morality
Modern feminism has been overwhelmed with more
immediate practical concerns. But when you look
back at the feminism of 150-75 years ago, it was
very tangled up in religious and spiritual arguments.
Traditional religious leaders who opposed feminism
argued that women were too weak for real morality - like
Eve, they could not resist temptation, only men could be
moral, so only men could use power responsibly. *gack*
(Doesn't Blaise look like a perfect example for them?)
The feminist counter-argument of the time was that women
were capable of moral judgement and behavior, some even
better than many men.

The earliest women's movements were not just to benefit
women...they were trying to use the moral judgement and
social responsibility attributed to women for other
purposes. In addition to the obvious women's rights
causes, they were instrumental in slavery oppostion,
labor organization, child abuse prevention, and early
pacifism.

If you're interested in a British perspective from the
1920s or thenabouts, look for anything by Vera Brittain.
She's only really remembered for "Testament of Youth,"
or as a pacifist, but she was involved with more liberal
causes than some people have heard of, and she could
write.

Adrian
[info]threeoranges wrote:
Apr. 13th, 2002 05:57 pm (UTC)
Re: feminism started with morality
Amen brother! Especially re Vera Brittain, I love her "Testament of Youth".

Oh dear. I thought Sphinx was a good writer, but after reading just how much she feels compelled to bash those who disagree with her about the head with repeated references to her Exhaustive Learning and Postmodern Literary Awareness, am I glad I never contributed to swelling that monstrous ego by reviewing her fanfic!

*I* found all the chapters engrossing, and I believe that I'm regarded as one of the most 'literate' writers of HP fanfiction. I can even write multisyllabic rhyming couplets that scan. You don't buy that? Fine, here's a (pre- and post-modern) challenge for you: go and rewrite my story "To Sever the Lining From a Cloud" and make it *better.* Make the metaphorical web tighter. Improve the syntax and the rhythm of the sentences. Render the story and its 'moral' (if you can find one, search me if I can) more ambiguous and complex. Give the Narrative voice greater precision, variety of tone and perspective. When you've done that, go and improve "Letter from Exile One Merciful Morning" in like manner. *Then* tell me I can't possibly be fucking literate for not sharing your viewpoint. (And if YOUR versions have greater literary merit than mine, you will of course become the Authorised Owner of those works.)

I don't need to comment further, do I? One of my friends put it best with the comment "If you can't feel modest, at least have the grace to pretend." And I fail to see what praising her own brilliance has to do with an actual defence of "Pawn to Queen". Isn't this just "I'm wonderful, *therefore* my opinion has more merit than yours?" I would have expected better of, in her own words, "one of the most 'literate' writers of HP fanfiction".

PtQ is a story which has, as you and Damiana have pointed out, some disturbing beliefs hidden amongst the ornate prose. Riley expressed her acceptance of fictional critique - not that the "Author" matters anyway, if I read Sphinx's critique above correctly! - and you are both taking the arguments expressed in PtQ to their logical and horrifying conclusions.

Perhaps later chapters of PtQ will blast your theories out of the water by showing strega (though if we're talking Italian plural, "witches", it really should be strege) as capable of selflessness, sacrifice, love and all that good stuff! Doubt it, but we'll have to see. Keep on writing ;-)
[info]demeter918 wrote:
Apr. 15th, 2002 11:16 pm (UTC)
Re: feminism started with morality
You know, I still like her fics, if I don't like her as a person. She's a good, if somewhat wordy, writer on Snape and Hermione's relationship. However, two words that can be used to describe her; overly-obessive. It wasn't even her own fic that was critiqued (since I refuse to believe that giving an opinion is harsh criticism).

Either way, it's *just* a fic. Good god. Does she have to get so defensive about something that's not real? Has she heard of the word 'flame' and what it derives from? *sigh* Has she heard of fandom wars?

*shakes head* That's why I exited the GW fandom. 'Cause of overly-defensive fans.

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow